We prepare US Provisional Patent Applications and Non-provisional Patent Applications. We also provide a ...
Patent searches are conducted onsite at the US Patent and Trademark Office on the East ...
Background A trademark can be many things — even sounds or smells. By definition, a ...
There are several TV shows that help independent inventors to achieve their dreams. Most viewers are familiar with the Shark Tank. Shark Tank has inventors/entrepreneurs compete for funding from potential investor sharks. A newer show is called Make Me a Millionaire Inventor. It is different from Shark Tank because once an inventor is selected to […]
The US Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) has made effective as of February 17, 2017 a rule concerning the examination of affidavits or declarations of continued use or excusable nonuse filed under section 8 of the Trademark Act, or affidavits or declarations of use in commerce or excusable nonuse filed under section 71 of the […]
The US Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) held in In re Bay State Brewing Company, Inc., Serial No. 85826258 (TTAB, February 25, 2016) that a consent agreement may not necessarily overcome a likelihood of confusion rejection by trademark examining attorney. At issue in the case was whether TIME TRAVEL BLONDE […]
On February 10, 2016 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) decided the case of Convolve, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Compaq Computer Corp. and Seagate Technology, Inc. (February 10, 2016, 2014-1732, CAFC). The technology at issue in the case involved improvements in computer hard drives described in US Patent No. 6,314,473 […]
On February 11, 2016, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) decided the case of Nike, Inc., V. Adidas AG, 2014-1719 (CAFC, February 11, 2016), in which Adidas filed an inter partes review (IPR) of US Patent No. 7,347, 011 (the ‘011 patent), owned by Nike. The USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal […]
In Rosebud LMS INC. v. Adobe Systems Incorporated (CAFC, 2015-1428, February 9, 2016) the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment that Adobe Systems Inc. was not liable for pre-issuance damages under 3 5 U. S. C. Section 154 (d). Rosebud filed three suits against Adobe […]