Trust your intellectual property matters to a firm that has solid experience in intellectual property litigation. Remember, the true value of your patent, trademark or copyright may not be fully known until after it has been tested through litigation.
The following cases were litigated directly or with the local counsel support of Pravel Intellectual Property Law, P.C.:
Rescue Phone, Inc. v. Enforcement Technology Group, Inc. et al., (Case Number 2:07cv58, US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 2007)
Motion for Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity of US Patent 6,442,240 was filed by James W. Pravel, of Counsel to Dunlap, Weaver et al.
James Pravel prepared Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of US US Patent 6,442,240.
Cased was dismissed with prejudice against Defendant prior to hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment.
Derrick Mfg. Corp. V. Southwestern Wire Cloth, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5809 (unpublished)
Domain Name Litigation:
PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and DR. ING. H.c.F. PORSCHE AG. vs. PORSCH.COM, an Internet domain name, et al. (Civ. No. 99-0006-A, Eastern District – VA)
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., a corporation vs. LUCENTSUCKS.COM, a domain name, 95 F. Supp. 2d 528 (E.D. Va. 2000)
PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and DR. ING. H.c.F. PORSCHE AG. vs. PORSCH.COM, an Internet domain name, et al. (Civ. No. 99-0006-A, Eastern District – VA).
Caesars World, Inc. v. Caesars-Palace.com et al., (Civ. No. 99-550-A, Eastern District – VA).
C.B. Fleet Company, Incorporated v. Spider Webs, Ltd. (Civ. No. 00-446-A, Eastern District – VA).
Ra-Ware Technologies, Inc. v. Raw Communications Limited, TTAB Number 122,922
Freegear, Inc. v. Trisha Teems Murphy; Trisha’s, Inc. and Mittu’s, Inc. (99-11272 (RZx) Central District – CA).